Displaying items by tag: Scot Stevenson

A fight that started inside the Desiree's strip club in Norton and ended in a death outside on the parking lot is sending a local man to prison for eight years. 37-year old Robert Lantz, Jr. of New Franklin was sentenced for involuntary manslaughter in the death of Daniel Carraway, 63. 

- - -

(Summit Prosecutor) Summit County Prosecutor Sherri Bevan Walsh announced today that Summit County Common Pleas Court Judge Scot Stevenson sentenced Robert Lantz Jr., 37, of Lullaby Lane in New Franklin, to eight years in prison for causing the death of a man at a Norton nightclub.

On August 26, 2016 Lantz pled guilty to the following charge:

Involuntary Manslaughter – a felony of the 1st degree

On November 19, 2015, Lantz physically assaulted 63-year-old Daniel Carraway at Desiree's in Norton. After they were kicked out of the bar, Lantz again attacked Carraway in the parking lot. Police arrived and found Carraway unresponsive. Carraway was taken to the hospital where he was pronounced dead.

"Daniel Carraway did not deserve to be brutally beaten and bludgeoned to death. His family continues to suffer because of the actions of Mr. Lantz," said Prosecutor Walsh. "Mr. Lantz will have eight years in prison to think about how his aggressive and violent behavior led to the death of a Marine veteran who served his country with honor."

Four judges on the ballot winning "excellent" ratings from the Akron Bar Association ahead of the election in two weeks. Tom Teodosio, Lynne Callahan, Donna Carr and Todd McKenney recognized based on seven criteria including integrity, knowledge of the law, experience and judicial temperment. The other candidates on the ballot seeking office in the Ninth District Court of Appeals, Domestic Relations and Common Pleas court also received "good" or "adequate" listings.

- - -

(Akron Bar Association) The Akron Bar Association Commission on Judicial Candidates has been established by the Akron Bar Association to evaluate candidates for local judgeships. The Commission rates the candidates "Excellent," "Good," "Adequate," or "Not Acceptable." Ratings are based on seven criteria: integrity, legal knowledge and ability, professional experience, judicial temperament, diligence, personal responsibility and public and community service.

The Akron Bar Association has created a website to not only promote the Commission's ratings, but to serve as a central source of information about the local judicial candidates appearing on the November ballot. In addition to the ratings, links to the candidates' websites and social media pages can easily be found. All ratings require a majority vote of the Commission; a rating of "Excellent" requires two thirds supermajority of the Commission. The ratings are not intended to be a comparison or endorsement of candidates, but only represent the Commission's evaluation of each individual candidate's qualifications for the specific office sought.

A rating of "Adequate" requires a vote of a majority of the Commission members present. If a candidate is rated "Adequate," a second ballot is taken to determine if the rating "Good" will be awarded, also requiring a vote of the majority of the Commission members present. If a candidate is rated "Good," a third ballot is taken to determine if the rating "Excellent" will be awarded. The "Excellent" rating requires the affirmative vote of a two-thirds majority of the Commission members present. The Commission is comprised of 28 experienced members of the Akron Bar Association selected by its Common Pleas, Municipal & Appellate Courts Committee, Family Law Section, Probate Law Section, the co-chairs of the Commission and the Bar President. No more than 50% of the Commission may be from any one political party. All candidates complete a questionnaire containing extensive biographical data and submit relevant materials, including writing samples. References for the candidates are interviewed and intensive interviews of the candidates are conducted.

This year, the Commission evaluated the judicial candidates running in the election scheduled for November 8, 2016. The ratings are as follows: Candidate ABA Commission Rating

9th District Court of Appeals:

Term Beginning 2/9/17 Diana M. Stevenson ADEQUATE Thomas A. Teodosio EXCELLENT

9th District Court of Appeals:

Term Beginning 2/11/17 Lynne S. Callahan EXCELLENT

9th District Court of Appeals:

Term Beginning 2/10/17 Donna J. Carr EXCELLENT

Court of Common Pleas - Domestic Relations Division

Begin 1/6/17 Ron Cable GOOD Katarina Cook GOOD

Court of Common Pleas - General Division

Begin 1/3/17 Joy Malek Oldfield GOOD Scot Stevenson GOOD

Court of Common Pleas - General Division

Begin 1/5/17 Alison Breaux ADEQUATE Todd McKenney EXCELLENT